Higher capital adequacy not justified under Solvency II: study
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Show more sharing options
  • Print
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Free Trial
  • Log in

Higher capital adequacy not justified under Solvency II: study

24 September 2012
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Show more sharing options
  • Print
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Regulatory initiatives under Solvency II and the US Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) have been challenged, after a study found that the losses stemming from natural catastrophes do not justify higher capital reserves for insurers.

Request a free trial:

Fuel a smarter strategy with our actionable market intelligence

    • Gain a competitive edge and accelerate decision-making
    • Be empowered by insights that transform confusion to clarity
    • Uncover growth opportunities and prepare for potential threats
Request a free trial Already a subscriber? Log in now

Topics

NewsRegulationSeptember 2012/5
Gift this article