Reinsurers’ reluctant to absorb US terrorism risks

02 June 2003

X
LinkedIn
Email
Show more sharing options

Despite US legislation last year mandating insurers to provide compulsory terrorism cover, reinsurance companies appear reluctant to assume any of the new exposure.

Enter your e-mail to claim a free trial:

Uncover exclusive insights tailored for insurance leaders

Stay Informed: Access exclusive industry insights
Gain a competitive advantage: Hear first about tactical developments
Make better decisions: Understand market dynamics in crucial lines of business

Take a free trial Already a subscriber? Login now

Reinsurers’ reluctant to absorb US terrorism risks

Uncover exclusive insights tailored for insurance leaders

Topics

Most Recent

Ambridge accused of ‘toxic’ work environment by ex-employees MGA Devonshire founders

Convex in ‘evolution not revolution’ phase: Brand

Londonitis: Beazley and Hiscox should look hard at their London listings

The Week in 90 Seconds: Willis Re-boot; Q1 results; Broker start-ups

Talanx reports prelim net income of EUR572mn in Q1

Behind the Headlines: Israel escalation and Convex's Paul Brand on building and running a $4bn (re)insurer

Marsh McLennan launches global alternative risk solutions practice

Reinsurers’ reluctant to absorb US terrorism risks

Login to continue

Uncover exclusive insights tailored for insurance leaders

Topics

Ambridge accused of ‘toxic’ work environment by ex-employees MGA Devonshire founders

Convex in ‘evolution not revolution’ phase: Brand

Londonitis: Beazley and Hiscox should look hard at their London listings

The Week in 90 Seconds: Willis Re-boot; Q1 results; Broker start-ups

Talanx reports prelim net income of EUR572mn in Q1

Behind the Headlines: Israel escalation and Convex's Paul Brand on building and running a $4bn (re)insurer

Marsh McLennan launches global alternative risk solutions practice