The potential pitfalls of writing directors' and officers' (D&O) coverage for financial institutions have been highlighted once again in the fallout from the long-running Stanford coverage dispute.
Demonstrating that a fraud exclusion is not enough, US courts have ruled that Lloyd's and London market insurers that underwrote the $90mn+ policy for Stanford Financial Group (SFG) executives must pay-out on defence costs.
The US appeal judges rejected the London insurers challenge even though the insureds may be later found guilty of...
You are currently viewing an incomplete version of this article. If you are a subscriber then please login now. If you are a non-subscriber but would like to be able to view this article, then please select from the purchasing options below.