The success of a controversial $45mn claim from Stanford Financial Group (SFG)'s former chief investment officer (CIO) against a number of Lloyd's insurers will boil down to the specific wording of the original directors' and officers' (D&O) policy in which crucial phrasing appears to be absent, according to legal experts.
The dispute is likely to be one of the first of a large number of disputes emerging from the financial turmoil that will rely on legal and court interpretations of...
You are currently viewing an incomplete version of this article. If you are a subscriber then please login now. If you are a non-subscriber but would like to be able to view this article, then please select from the purchasing options below.