The criteria proposed for choosing "too big to fail" insurers do not give an incentive to stop risky behaviour and could let companies engaged in systemically risky activities slip through the net, a leading insurance lobby group and thinktank has warned.
Click to enlarge
The International Association of Insurance
Supervisors (IAIS)'s proposed methodology for assessing global
systemically important insurers (G-SIIs) has been up for discussion
over June and July. But the test has faced strong criticism from
insurance industry watchdog...
You are currently viewing an incomplete version of this article. If you are a subscriber then please login now. If you are a non-subscriber but would like to be able to view this article, then please select from the purchasing options below.